Tesla Challenges $243 Million Verdict in Autopilot Death Trial
Tesla is contesting the $243 million judgment a jury delivered in a case involving a fatal accident where the Autopilot system was engaged. The electric car maker claims errors occurred during the trial and that the awarded damages are excessive.
Details of the Case
The lawsuit originated from a 2018 crash in which a Tesla Model X operating on Autopilot struck a highway barrier resulting in the driver’s death. Accordingly the plaintiffs argued that Autopilot was defective and moreover claimed that Tesla failed to adequately warn drivers about its limitations.
Driver Responsibility Above All
Tesla emphasizes that Autopilot is an assistive system not a replacement for human drivers. Consequently they argue that the driver distracted and speeding was fully responsible for the crash. Furthermore their appeal asserts that no defect existed in the vehicle or system.
Errors in Trial Process & Jury Misleading
Tesla contends the trial was compromised by substantial errors of law and irregularities calling the verdict legally unjustified.
The company claims plaintiff attorneys improperly influenced the jury by invoking Elon Musk’s public statements and introducing prejudicial evidence including previously undisclosed video and collision data.
Withheld Evidence Raised After Trial
Tesla originally claimed it lacked key data from the crash. However, a hacker later recovered a stored collision snapshot which contradicted Tesla’s statements. This raised concerns over Tesla’s transparency and handling of critical evidence.
Dangerous Legal Precedent & Innovation Risk
Tesla argues sanctioning manufacturers for accidents involving user misuse could chill innovation and hamper future development of advanced safety features. They assert punitive damages in this case may violate Florida’s statutory caps.
Rejection of Settlement Before Trial
Reports revealed Tesla had previously rejected a $60 million settlement but the jury went on to award $243 million, significantly beyond that initial offer.
Drive Tesla
Tesla’s Requested Relief
Tesla’s legal team now including top appellate lawyers from Gibson Dunn has formally asked the court to:
- Overturn the verdict or
- Order a new trial or
- Reduce compensatory and punitive damages particularly under Florida’s legal limits.
Key Arguments in the Appeal
- Evidentiary Issues: Tesla contends the court improperly admitted certain pieces of evidence.
- Jury Instructions: Tesla claims the jury received flawed instructions that prejudiced their case.
- Damage Amount: Tesla asserts the $243 million award is disproportionate to the actual damages suffered.
Implications for Autopilot Technology
This case and Tesla appeal have significant implications for the future of Autopilot and similar driver-assistance systems. The outcome could influence how manufacturers market and deploy these technologies as well as the level of liability they face in the event of accidents.
