Tag: disruption

  • Airport Disruptions Continue After Cyberattack

    Airport Disruptions Continue After Cyberattack

    European Airports Still Grappling with Aftermath of Cyberattack

    Several European airports are still experiencing disruptions following a recent ransomware attack. The incident which occurred several days ago continues to impact flight schedules and airport operations causing headaches for travelers.

    Impact on Airport Operations

    The ransomware attack has affected key systems leading to:

    • Flight delays and cancellations
    • Disruptions in baggage handling
    • Check-in process slowdowns

    Airlines and airport authorities are working to restore systems and minimize further disruptions. Passengers are advised to check their flight status and arrive at the airport well in advance.

    Cybersecurity Measures

    This recent airport cyberattack underscores exactly how fragile critical infrastructure can be and reinforces the need for proactive multilayered defenses. Below is more information on the incident the risks it highlights and best practices for strengthening cybersecurity in such contexts.

    Recent Incident European Airport Disruption

    In September 2025 major European airports Heathrow Berlin Brussels among others experienced disruptions to check-in boarding and baggage systems. The issue was traced to a cyberattack on Collins Aerospace’s MUSE vMUSE system which many carriers use for shared check-in boarding infrastructure.

    The EU cybersecurity agency ENISA confirmed the attack was a ransomware incident.
    Because many airports use the same vendor system attacking a central provider allowed wide downstream impact i.e. a supply chain attack.

    Some airports reverted to manual operations as a fallback but service quality and throughput were heavily degraded.
    Experts note that reactive defenses are no longer sufficient. Systems must be resilient continuously monitored and designed with failure modes in mind.

    Why Airports Are Attractive Targets

    • High impact & visibility: Disrupting airport systems causes enormous operational chaos financial losses and media attention.
    • Tightly integrated systems: Airports have many connected systems check-in baggage flight ops radar passenger services. A breach in one can cascade.
    • Legacy aging infrastructure: Many systems weren’t built with modern cybersecurity threats in mind they might rely on outdated protocols or weak segmentation.
    • Vendor supply chain exposure: As seen in this case a compromise at a third-party vendor can cascade to multiple airports.
    • Regulatory & legal consequences: When critical services are impacted regulatory bodies may impose fines oversight, or mandate cybersecurity standards.

    Ransomware Attacks on the Rise

    • In 2025 nearly 63% of businesses worldwide reported being affected by ransomware. Statista
    • Government entities have seen a 65% increase in ransomware attacks in the first half of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024.
    • Total logged ransomware attacks in H1 2025 were 3,627 globally up about 47% over H1 2024.

    Key Impacts & Costs

    • Ransom demands: For government agencies in H1 2025 the average ransom requested was about US$1.65 million across both confirmed and unconfirmed attacks. In confirmed attacks average demands rose to nearly US$2.44 million.
    • Downtime: Manufacturing firms are reporting average downtime of 11.6 days per ransomware incident with losses of ~US$1.9 million per day from downtime in some cases.
    • Total economic impact:
      • In Germany cyber-attacks ransomware being the most damaging cost the economy about €300 billion ~US$355 billion) over a recent period.
      • In one case Jaguar Land Rover expects losses of £3.5 billion revenue and £1.3 billion gross profits if its disrupted operations don’t resume quickly after its cyberattack.

    Other Costs Beyond the Ransom

    • Recovery costs: Hiring cybersecurity experts forensic investigations restoring systems and data from backups.
    • Operational disruption: Lost productivity halting or slowing of services possibly shutting down entire facilities or supply chains.
    • Reputational damage: Loss of customer trust customer compensation regulatory scrutiny.
    • Regulatory fines & legal exposure: If data breaches occur or privacy laws are violated.

    Recent High-Profile Examples

    Jaguar Land Rover: A cyberattack has led to a factory shutdown major supply chain disruption with enormous cost implications.
    Collins Aerospace RTX: Ransomware attack disrupted airport check-in and baggage drop systems across Europe.

  • Orange Warns of Disruption Amid Cyberattack

    Orange Warns of Disruption Amid Cyberattack

    Orange Faces Disruption Amid Ongoing Cyberattack

    Telecom giant Orange is currently grappling with a significant cyberattack, which has prompted warnings of potential service disruptions for its customers. The company’s security teams are working diligently to mitigate the impact and restore normalcy.

    Details of the Cyberattack

    While Orange has not released specific details about the nature of the cyberattack, the company acknowledges that it is causing disruptions across various services. Such attacks often involve:

    • Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks aiming to overwhelm systems.
    • Malware infections compromising network integrity.
    • Data breaches targeting sensitive user information.

    Orange’s Response and Mitigation Efforts

    In response to the ongoing cyberattack, Orange has activated its incident response protocols. These measures include:

    • Isolating affected systems to prevent further spread.
    • Enhancing monitoring and detection capabilities.
    • Collaborating with cybersecurity experts and law enforcement agencies.
    • Providing regular updates to customers regarding service status.

    Potential Impact on Customers

    Orange customers may experience several disruptions due to the cyberattack, including:

    • Intermittent connectivity issues.
    • Slower internet speeds.
    • Temporary unavailability of certain services.

    Industry-Wide Concerns

    This cyberattack on Orange underscores the increasing threats faced by telecom companies. With the rise of sophisticated cybercriminals, businesses must invest in robust cybersecurity measures, such as:

    • Regular security audits and penetration testing.
    • Employee training on phishing and malware awareness.
    • Implementing multi-factor authentication.
    • Deploying advanced threat detection and response solutions.
  • Soham Parekh Multi‑Job Scandal Divides Tech

    Soham Parekh Multi‑Job Scandal Divides Tech

    Soham Parekh: A Divisive Figure in Tech?

    In the fast-paced world of technology, where innovation and disruption are the norms, it’s rare to find a figure about whom everyone agrees. Soham Parekh, however, seems to be one such individual. Across the tech landscape, opinions on Parekh are varied and passionate.

    Why the Divergence?

    Soham Parekh sparks strong reactions across tech. Opinions vary widely based on his problem-solving style, leadership approach, and public statements.

    Disruptive Problem-Solving

    Parekh shocks with his technical speed and critical thinking. Many founders rank him in the top 0.1% of engineers for his mental toughness and ability to architect solutions without relying on code puzzles .
    Nevertheless, when he overpromises on deliverables—such as overlapping work across startups and missing deadlines—criticism follows .

    Unconventional Leadership

    He prefers equity-heavy contracts, self-directing and delivering asynchronously—qualities admired in fast-moving, remote-first teams .
    However, some view his approach as opaque and non-committal, especially when he’s not fully transparent about time or role commitments linkedin.com.

    Outspoken Industry Views

    Parekh’s candid talks and private messages—like asking how to repair his reputation—show both self-awareness and contrition
    Still, public founders like Suhail Doshi and many YC-backed CEOs criticized his behavior, calling it deceptive and warning the tech community

    Burnout, Ethics & Remote Pressures

    Supporters frame him as a symptom of post-pandemic burnout—working 140-hour weeks under severe financial strain .
    Critics argue that truth and transparency are non-negotiable. They cite the need for better vetting, especially with so many remote hires and the rise of moonlighting cases .

    Areas of Contention

    Here are some common points of discussion surrounding Soham Parekh:

    • Innovation vs. Disruption: Parekh’s ideas often challenge the status quo, leading to debates about whether they are truly innovative or simply disruptive.
    • Leadership Style: Their leadership approach, which some perceive as unconventional, garners both praise and criticism. Some find it empowering, while others consider it too unorthodox.
    • Industry Commentary: Parekh isn’t shy about sharing their opinions on the latest tech trends. These opinions, while thought-provoking, sometimes spark controversy.